HI All,
Could you please let me know the use of Enhancement-Point and Enhancement-Section.
Thanx in Advance.
Regards
ambi
↧
Re: Enhancement-point VS Enhancment-Section
↧
MV45AFZZ cancel document saving process
Hi,
I'm investigating an option on how to cancel the saving process of a document in user-exit include MV45AFZZ from within transaction VA01/VA02.
Currently I've tried to do some MESSAGE E in FORM USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE or FORM USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT w/o any success so far.
Of course MESSAGE A is possible but does a hard break and is not the best solution at all.
Setting any screen like SET SCREEN 0 or LEAVE TO SCREEN 0 or any similar things did not work either.
What am I trying to do? I would like to check some VBAP/VBAK fields if certain conditions are met and cancel the saving process if necessary - of course without dropping the complete document.
I've already searched the forum here and only found hints like those already mentioned above - but nothing really specific.
Another thing which came into my mind is what about storing some a line into the incomplete log of the transaction to prevent from saving? However, I did not found any function module to add some lines to the log in user-exit MV45AFZZ so far.
Any hints on how to accomplish this?
↧
↧
Exit/BTE for tx F110 (SAPF110S), Automatic Payments (field XREF3)
Hello,
I have been searching for a long time the posts in the forums regarding similar issues, but I can not find a suitable solution.
The problem is:
It's needed to fill one field of the payment document (BSEG-XREF3) created by tx F110, with the value coming from the original document (REGUP-XREF3) that is processed by F110 (SAPF110S).
I can not find a BTE / exit that: 1) Could be reached during F110 execution and 2) contains data from both documents, or something similar that could allow me to gather the data from both documents.
Let me say that I'm very AWARE of the fact that SAPF110S schedules and executes all this processes in background; I am debugging it using the okcode JDBG in tx SM37. In fact, I can "reach" and debugg another BTE already in use (BTE process 1120, FI document creation), when the payment document is created. This one could be suitable to pass the value to the payment document that is to be created.
The other BTE only reached is BTE process 1830, but this one is only executed during proposal creation, and although I get access to REGUP values, the only possibility is to save the value with SET/GET parameters statement, in order to pass the value in memory for the next execution of F110, but this approach is not good at all.
Any ideas? Somebody has resolved something similar?
(In forums, a lot of people talks abouts exits or BTEs that they has never used before).
I have tested various of the user-exits that came across searching in the forums, and the BADI FI_F110_SCHEDULE_JOB, but:
-No one of the u-exits works, and
-The BADI is not suitable for solving the problem.
Thanks in advance,
José Gabriel Martínez.
Edited by: José Gabriel on Sep 7, 2009 2:06 PM
↧
How to create Authority check object
Hello Gurus,
How to create Authority-check object 'ZABC'
ID 'TABLE' FIELD 'ZTABLE'.
Please tell me detailed procedure.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
zubera
↧
How To Find Screen Exit & Menu Exit
Hi Friends,
How can we find Screen Exit & Menu Exit?
Kindly do not specify the report which is prevailing all over.
And does class CL_EXITHANDLER also return exits apart from BADI names ?
Regards,
Pradeep
↧
↧
Exit/BTE for tx F110 (SAPF110S), Automatic Payments (field XREF3)
Hello,
I have been searching for a long time the posts in the forums regarding similar issues, but I can not find a suitable solution.
The problem is:
It's needed to fill one field of the payment document (BSEG-XREF3) created by tx F110, with the value coming from the original document (REGUP-XREF3) that is processed by F110 (SAPF110S).
I can not find a BTE / exit that: 1) Could be reached during F110 execution and 2) contains data from both documents, or something similar that could allow me to gather the data from both documents.
Let me say that I'm very AWARE of the fact that SAPF110S schedules and executes all this processes in background; I am debugging it using the okcode JDBG in tx SM37. In fact, I can "reach" and debugg another BTE already in use (BTE process 1120, FI document creation), when the payment document is created. This one could be suitable to pass the value to the payment document that is to be created.
The other BTE only reached is BTE process 1830, but this one is only executed during proposal creation, and although I get access to REGUP values, the only possibility is to save the value with SET/GET parameters statement, in order to pass the value in memory for the next execution of F110, but this approach is not good at all.
Any ideas? Somebody has resolved something similar?
(In forums, a lot of people talks abouts exits or BTEs that they has never used before).
I have tested various of the user-exits that came across searching in the forums, and the BADI FI_F110_SCHEDULE_JOB, but:
-No one of the u-exits works, and
-The BADI is not suitable for solving the problem.
Thanks in advance,
José Gabriel Martínez.
Edited by: José Gabriel on Sep 7, 2009 2:06 PM
↧
MIRO - User Exit during SAVE: Read items & Update header
Hi there!
During MIRO after pressing save...
I search for an user-exit or BAdI, to READ ITEM DATA and UPDATE HEADER DATA (XBLNR) after SAVE but before UPDATE.
I have searched this forum, but with no luck. Many more then me seem to have the same problem. The most common answer have been to try BAdI INVOICE_UPDATE, but that BAdI only give READ access and NO UPDATE, so no luck there..
To summarize all my searching here and findings... I list all exits I have tested...
User-Exits
LMR1M001 User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M002 Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance
LMR1M003 Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M004 Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on docs
LMR1M005 Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Posting
LMR1M006 Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice
MRMH0001 Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure
MRMH0002 Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound
MRMH0003 Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP
MRMN0001 Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification
BADI - When saving in MIRO the following BAdI were passed...
PPA_CUST_BADI
/CCIS/FICLRDC_ENH
INVOICE_UPDATE << only read no update
ME_DP_CLEARING
AC_DOCUMENT
FI_LIMIT_PROCESS
AC_QUANTITY_GET
FMRE_BUS_PROCESS
EXIT_XFMPRI_001
CO_DOCUMENT_INFO
INVOICE_UPDATE (method change_before_update ) << only read no update
MRM_RANSACT_DEFAULT
MRM_HEADER_DEFAULT
Other BAdI's
MRM_HEADER_CHECK - Bara ingående värden för kontroll
MRM_HEADER_DEFAULT - Tyvärr sätter bara XBLNR precis när man går in i MIRO...dvs för tidigt.
MRM_ERS_HDAT_MODIFY - EJ anropad...
Would be greatful for any ideas on this matter...
Best regards
Henrik
↧
Difference b/w static and instance method
 In BADI what is the difference between Static Method and Instance Metbod?
↧
how to implement enhancement spot
hi to all experts,
how to implement enhancement spots for example ENHANCEMENT-POINT SAPLMEGUI_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLMEGUI STATIC.
i dont have any idea regarding this please help me
thanks
↧
↧
Add custom fields in Additional Data B tab (header) in VA01/02 using BADI
Hi experts,
My requirement is to add custom fields from custom table( z or y table) to Additional Data B tab (header) of VA01 transaction. How can we do it using BADI's? I do not want to use the access key and modify respective screens in SAPMV45A.
I'v seen many threads related to this issue but none of them were answered. Hope I'll get it with your help. Thanks in advance.
Edited by: srivarma on Dec 8, 2011 10:09 AM
Edited by: srivarma on Dec 8, 2011 10:15 AM
↧
Re: Enhancement-point VS Enhancment-Section
HI All,
Could you please let me know the use of Enhancement-Point and Enhancement-Section.
Thanx in Advance.
Regards
ambi
↧
Problem while Creating Validation user exit in GGB0
Dear All ,
i have created one Validation user-exit in GGB0 for FI followed all steps 1
1) Copied RGGBR000 to ZRGGBR000 .
2) added exit-name , title ,parameter none .
exits-name = 'ZORD'.
exits-param = c_exit_param_none. "Complete data used in exit.
exits-title = text-105. "Posting date check
APPEND exits.
3) also form . endform
FORM zord USING b_result.
tables : coas .
if sy-tcode ='MB1A' .
endif.
ENDFORM.
4) done changes in table t80d using GCX2
modified zprogram name for application area gblr
5) there is also entry in ob28 for validation rule
6) executed report RGUGBR00 .
7) when i go in GGB0 and put cursor on exit and click on ABAP editor it show that code ...
8) when i called that exit through GGB0 it does not gives call to that exit NAME "ZORD" ?
Could you please guide us for the same .
I have attached the screen shot of exit created by name zord .
Regards
Deepak.
↧
how to implement enhancement spot
hi to all experts,
how to implement enhancement spots for example ENHANCEMENT-POINT SAPLMEGUI_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLMEGUI STATIC.
i dont have any idea regarding this please help me
thanks
↧
↧
Confusion in classic and kernel badis
Hi Experts , I have checked in
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/ee/6f3b42ea85b26be10000000a155106/content.htm
above link explains difference between classic and new badi.
but there are a lot of confusions.
Point 1 :
With classic BAdIs, a BAdI object is created by calling a factory method, and referenced via a reference variable of the type of the BAdI interface.
With new BAdIs, a BAdI object is created via the ABAP statement GET BADIas a handle for the calls of BAdI methods, referenced via a reference variable of the type of the BAdI.
A BAdI object is an instance of an internal BAdI class, which otherwise is invisible to the outside.
What is the point as both badis are refrenced by refrence varable of badi? please explain.
` Point 2 :
a. With the classical BAdIs, the filter values are stored in a structure and passed with the call of the BAdI methods.
b. With the new BAdIs, the comparison values for the filters used to search for implementations are passed when the BAdI object is created with the GET BADI statement.
There is no way of migrating the call of the factory method one-to-one into the ABAP statement, because GET BADI can also return an existing BAdI object, which is not possible with the factory method.
Can any 1 Explain this with a simple example.
Point 3 :
. A classic BAdI can be called only once and the call positions are registered centrally.
With new BAdIs, multiple calls are possible and the call positions are not registered centrally.
For the above reasons, an automatic call migration is not possible.
What is the meaning of registered cenrallly?
Please help experts...
C
W
Message was edited by: Suhas Saha
↧
Userexit for service order(IW31.iw32) after saving ...
Hi,
Can anybody help me in finding a userexit for service order after saving.
My requirement is to get characteristic values after saving into zfields of AUFK table.
I cant use any exit which is trigered before saving of service order since characteristics values can be changed while saving.
I am using FM CUCB_GET_SINGLE_INSTANCE to get the characteristics values..
Any input will be appreciated...!
regards,
Sheeba
↧
MIRO - User Exit during SAVE: Read items & Update header
Hi there!
During MIRO after pressing save...
I search for an user-exit or BAdI, to READ ITEM DATA and UPDATE HEADER DATA (XBLNR) after SAVE but before UPDATE.
I have searched this forum, but with no luck. Many more then me seem to have the same problem. The most common answer have been to try BAdI INVOICE_UPDATE, but that BAdI only give READ access and NO UPDATE, so no luck there..
To summarize all my searching here and findings... I list all exits I have tested...
User-Exits
LMR1M001 User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M002 Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance
LMR1M003 Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M004 Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on docs
LMR1M005 Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Posting
LMR1M006 Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice
MRMH0001 Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure
MRMH0002 Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound
MRMH0003 Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP
MRMN0001 Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification
BADI - When saving in MIRO the following BAdI were passed...
PPA_CUST_BADI
/CCIS/FICLRDC_ENH
INVOICE_UPDATE << only read no update
ME_DP_CLEARING
AC_DOCUMENT
FI_LIMIT_PROCESS
AC_QUANTITY_GET
FMRE_BUS_PROCESS
EXIT_XFMPRI_001
CO_DOCUMENT_INFO
INVOICE_UPDATE (method change_before_update ) << only read no update
MRM_RANSACT_DEFAULT
MRM_HEADER_DEFAULT
Other BAdI's
MRM_HEADER_CHECK - Bara ingående värden för kontroll
MRM_HEADER_DEFAULT - Tyvärr sätter bara XBLNR precis när man går in i MIRO...dvs för tidigt.
MRM_ERS_HDAT_MODIFY - EJ anropad...
Would be greatful for any ideas on this matter...
Best regards
Henrik
↧
Customer Exit for service PO in ME21N
Dear All,
When I create service PO with the following step:
1. Create a purchase request (PR) with an item which item category ('D' - Service)
2. Input a Service number / External service no. in item's details
3. Create a purchase order (PO) with ref to that PR
4. Input an outline agreement number into the PO item
5. Copy service line item(s) to PO<b> only if </b>service number / External service no. are covered by the Outline agreement number.
I want know how to make a checking by customer exit in ME21N at step 5?
Thanks,
Well
↧
↧
Confusion in classic and kernel badis
Hi Experts , I have checked in
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/ee/6f3b42ea85b26be10000000a155106/content.htm
above link explains difference between classic and new badi.
but there are a lot of confusions.
Point 1 :
With classic BAdIs, a BAdI object is created by calling a factory method, and referenced via a reference variable of the type of the BAdI interface.
With new BAdIs, a BAdI object is created via the ABAP statement GET BADIas a handle for the calls of BAdI methods, referenced via a reference variable of the type of the BAdI.
A BAdI object is an instance of an internal BAdI class, which otherwise is invisible to the outside.
What is the point as both badis are refrenced by refrence varable of badi? please explain.
` Point 2 :
a. With the classical BAdIs, the filter values are stored in a structure and passed with the call of the BAdI methods.
b. With the new BAdIs, the comparison values for the filters used to search for implementations are passed when the BAdI object is created with the GET BADI statement.
There is no way of migrating the call of the factory method one-to-one into the ABAP statement, because GET BADI can also return an existing BAdI object, which is not possible with the factory method.
Can any 1 Explain this with a simple example.
Point 3 :
. A classic BAdI can be called only once and the call positions are registered centrally.
With new BAdIs, multiple calls are possible and the call positions are not registered centrally.
For the above reasons, an automatic call migration is not possible.
What is the meaning of registered cenrallly?
Please help experts...
C
W
Message was edited by: Suhas Saha
↧
Problem while Creating Validation user exit in GGB0
Dear All ,
i have created one Validation user-exit in GGB0 for FI followed all steps 1
1) Copied RGGBR000 to ZRGGBR000 .
2) added exit-name , title ,parameter none .
exits-name = 'ZORD'.
exits-param = c_exit_param_none. "Complete data used in exit.
exits-title = text-105. "Posting date check
APPEND exits.
3) also form . endform
FORM zord USING b_result.
tables : coas .
if sy-tcode ='MB1A' .
endif.
ENDFORM.
4) done changes in table t80d using GCX2
modified zprogram name for application area gblr
5) there is also entry in ob28 for validation rule
6) executed report RGUGBR00 .
7) when i go in GGB0 and put cursor on exit and click on ABAP editor it show that code ...
8) when i called that exit through GGB0 it does not gives call to that exit NAME "ZORD" ?
Could you please guide us for the same .
I have attached the screen shot of exit created by name zord .
Regards
Deepak.
↧
Userexit for service order(IW31.iw32) after saving ...
Hi,
Can anybody help me in finding a userexit for service order after saving.
My requirement is to get characteristic values after saving into zfields of AUFK table.
I cant use any exit which is trigered before saving of service order since characteristics values can be changed while saving.
I am using FM CUCB_GET_SINGLE_INSTANCE to get the characteristics values..
Any input will be appreciated...!
regards,
Sheeba
↧